Lebanon bombarded by Israel: Australia refuses to confront Israel and reckon with its own alignment behind it

Australia is telling people to get out of Lebanon while refusing to say plainly who is turning Lebanon into a place people need to flee. Israel is bombing Lebanon again. Families are fleeing the southern suburbs of Beirut. Roads out of the city are jammed with people trying to escape Israeli strikes. Reuters reports that roughly 300,000 people have been displaced across Lebanon in recent days, with around 100,000 fleeing Beirut’s southern districts alone after bombardment. Lebanon is proof that Israel’s military campaign has widened beyond Gaza and is now destabilising the region in plain sight. Australia knows that. It has recognised the danger through evacuation warnings and heightened alert settings. Yet it still refuses to directly name Israel as the aggressor and reckon with its own alignment with Israel. And this is not happening at a distance from Australia’s own choices. It is happening after the Labor government chose to publicly stand with Israel again.

In February, Anthony Albanese rolled out the red carpet for Israeli President Isaac Herzog, inviting him to Australia in a so-called "display of solidarity", despite the commission of inquiry finding that Herzog incited genocide. Chris Sidoti, a former member of the UN commission, called the invitation a "crazy idea". Now Lebanon is under attack by Israel, and Australia still manages the fallout in public while refusing to name the state inflicting it.

The contradiction is sharper still because Australia is no longer speaking from the sidelines. The government has already publicly backed the US-Israel strikes on Iran, and Anthony Albanese has confirmed that three Australian personnel were aboard the US submarine that sank an Iranian warship, even while denying they took part in the attack. That means Australia has already inserted itself into the political and military architecture of this escalation.

Gaza has been devastated, Lebanon is under attack, Iran has now been struck directly, and Australia continues to align itself with the forces driving that expansion while refusing to accept responsibility for the side it is on.

The Australian public is entitled to ask what this government is waiting for. How many cities must be struck, how many families must flee, and how much regional devastation must unfold for this government to cease its reliance on crisis management as a substitute for naming and confronting the aggressor? How much destruction must accumulate before ministers are prepared to state clearly that Israel is deliberately expanding its military campaign across the region? A government cannot recognise the danger in practice and deny its source in public language.

The Muslim Vote is raising this because the world is being dragged toward a wider war through Israel’s continuing military escalation, and Australia is following with the same automatic deference it has shown before. By refusing to hold Israel accountable, Australia is not just failing to describe the escalation honestly. It is helping create the conditions in which that evasion remains possible, and that makes its own political posture morally hollow. If the government can maintain the relationship, issue the warnings, and still refuse to name the truth, then the public should ask what level of destruction will finally force this government to confront what Israel is doing in full view of the world.

At that point, this is no longer a failure to speak. It is a decision to stay aligned with the aggression while pretending to stand outside it.

Follow us on Instagram

Instagram